the inertness-dichotomy "next step" entry is retired in favour of a filed presentation priority

Maintainer ruling, taken in conversation and landed by the consolidation round. The queue entry asking whether to answer PRIORITIES.md item 61 before widening the toy predates the affordability line and is retired. Item 61 stays open as stated — no source is shown to satisfy summable enforcement liability. What the maintainer names as pending is a mature presentation of affordability from the general traderization perspective, filed as PRIORITIES.md item 88, against which item 61 is to be measured. Rejected alternative: leaving the entry as a choice between two orders neither of which the current theory poses.