Alignment Workspace

anti-naturality-walk

leaf/step · drafted

Statement

The walk through the published anti-naturality arguments, one by one with the sources that carry each and the objections it absorbs, ends in a written definition of corrigibility that survives the arguments.

Source

The ordered table in projects/deference/corrigibility-note-dump-2026-10-01/corrigibility-discussion-outline.md, which walks the anti-naturality arguments one by one.

Notes

The plan root of the review frame, an actioned step: the work is the remaining sessions in the re-ordered sequence 4, 6, 7, 5, 8, 3, 9, and the deliverable is the definition at the end. The per-item work sits as actions on the argument leaves; this leaf's action is the walk as a whole.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 2; size L.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "AI number"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": {
  "J": 0,
  "mid": "21/40",
  "range": [
   "1/40",
   "1/1"
  ],
  "width": "1/1"
 },
 "draft": "ai",
 "root": {
  "status": "open",
  "Pr": {
   "hi": "1/1",
   "lo": "1/40",
   "mid": "21/40"
  },
  "value": {
   "hi": "1/1",
   "lo": "-1/1",
   "mid": "21/40"
  },
  "cost": "240/1",
  "margin": "no established leaves"
 }
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want