bridge-trace-vs-transparency
leaf/question · drafted
Statement
The finite trace non-recoverability theorem and the public theory's transparency condition say the same thing: provenance must be declared in the record, not inferred from it.
Source
projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/legit-finite-defect/legit-finite-defect-report.md, the detection target's transparency near-miss (adding the influence map to the record separates the two-system pair); wiki/Legitimacy.md, section "Legitimacy has two halves" (transparency as a declared reference). The correspondence is the filing session's reading.
Notes
A second row of the bridge; conditioned on the task that measures every candidate against the endorsement-based definition of legitimacy in the May 2026 research plan, which is the row zero the table needs.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"given task-measure-candidates-against-definition",
"held by legitimacy"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "13/20",
"range": [
"3/20",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.