cdt-defined-for-learner.bridge
leaf/bridge · drafted
Statement
The declaration's interventional and conditional suppositions are the note's CDT and EDT renderings at a recorded point, so its biconditional is Theorem 3(i) as the note states it.
Source
projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/dp-causal-consist/dp-causal-consist-report.md against projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/sources/decision-problems/directions/defining-cdt-in-the-learning-setting.md.
No passage is quoted: the bridge reconstructs the source's claim from the package report's statement of what it formalizes, so the attribution stands unvetted until a reader sets the two texts side by side.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of cdt-defined-for-learner
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"attribution unvetted"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "7/10",
"range": [
"1/5",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.