Alignment Workspace

complete-feedback-formal-model

leaf/step · drafted

Statement

A formal model of complete feedback links legitimacy with the reflection principle and the endorsement framework and shows corrigibility to be rational.

Source

projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/sources/unbounded-embedded/03-journals/2026-03-26.md: "Make a formal model of complete feedback, linking legitimacy with the reflection principle and meaning & agency to show that corrigibility can be rational."

Notes

The task statement of the dated note, filed as a plan step with the work as its action. Partly served by the value-change note's section 2 (reflection conditional on legitimacy) and by the legit-neg clean-room packages; no document names itself as this model. Success is valued as the frame's top class, the convention for plan roots.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size L.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "AI number"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": {
  "J": 0,
  "mid": "2/5",
  "range": [
   "0/1",
   "9/10"
  ],
  "width": "1/1"
 },
 "draft": "ai",
 "root": {
  "status": "open",
  "Pr": {
   "hi": "9/10",
   "lo": "0/1",
   "mid": "2/5"
  },
  "value": {
   "hi": "1/1",
   "lo": "-1/1",
   "mid": "2/5"
  },
  "cost": "240/1",
  "margin": "no established leaves"
 }
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want