deconfusing.theorem1.bridge
leaf/bridge · drafted
Statement
The statement of record of `deconfusing.theorem1` formalizes the registered claim as the registry reads it: Theorem 1 (three ranges): a violated history scores at most 1 − λ < −δ; a violation-free illegitimate history scores in [−δ, 0); a violation-free legitimate history scores in [0, 1].
Source
projects/deference/CLAIMS.md, entry deconfusing.theorem1 (class lean-proved, status active, origin round 2026-10-17-post-companion-formalization; answers item 107). Documentation: verification: prompts/2026-10-17-post-companion-formalization/REPORT.md; context: prompts/2026-10-17-post-companion-formalization/PROMPT.md; companion: wiki/Deconfusing-Corrigibility-Companion.md. Short name: Theorem 1 (three ranges): a violated history scores at most 1 − λ < −δ; a violation-free illegitimate history scores in [−δ, 0); a violation-free legitimate history scores in [0, 1]. Conclusion of the signature: ((1 ≤ Sc.N h → Sc.S h ≤ 1 - Sc.lam) ∧ 1 - Sc.lam < -Sc.δ) ∧ (Sc.N h = 0 ∧ ¬ Sc.Legit h → -Sc.δ ≤ Sc.S h ∧ Sc.S h < 0) ∧ (Sc.N h = 0 ∧ Sc.Legit h → 0 ≤ Sc.S h ∧ Sc.S h ≤ 1).
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of deconfusing.theorem1
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"attribution unvetted",
"no belief"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": null,
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.