deconfusing.theorem2b.bridge
leaf/bridge · drafted
Statement
The statement of record of `deconfusing.theorem2b` formalizes the registered claim as the registry reads it: Theorem 2(b): U a* − U a ≥ (λ − (1 + δ)) · v a − κ.
Source
projects/deference/CLAIMS.md, entry deconfusing.theorem2b (class lean-proved, status active, origin round 2026-10-17-post-companion-formalization; answers item 107). Documentation: verification: prompts/2026-10-17-post-companion-formalization/REPORT.md; context: prompts/2026-10-17-post-companion-formalization/PROMPT.md; companion: wiki/Deconfusing-Corrigibility-Companion.md. Short name: Theorem 2(b): U a* − U a ≥ (λ − (1 + δ)) · v a − κ. Conclusion of the signature: D.U astar - D.U a ≥ (D.lam - (1 + D.δ)) * D.v a - D.κ a astar.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of deconfusing.theorem2b
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"attribution unvetted",
"no belief"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": null,
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.