defensible-ledger-ruled
leaf/task · drafted
Statement
A dated ruling says whether the defensible-claims ledger the epistemic-status discipline names is created beside the map's vettedness levels and the claims registries, or retired in their favour.
Source
projects/deference/note-dump-2026-08-11/wiki/epistemic-discipline.md, section 3, rule 5: a ledger of public-statable claims with grade, reasons, follow-ups and a vetted bit only the maintainer sets. graph/PROTOCOL.md, section 3 (vettedness levels); projects/deference/CLAIMS.md.
Notes
The epistemic-discipline page plans the ledger for the li-deference cluster; this ruling decides whether the record is kept in one mechanism or three.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity-opus55; version 1; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "183/200",
"range": [
"83/200",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.