grouping-austerity-divergence-located
leaf/question · drafted
Statement
The point at which the formal core's account of decision problems and Daniel Herrmann's thesis diverge (how decision points are grouped into policies, or the austerity condition on acts of probability zero) is identified, with the formal-core definitions that record each side named.
Source
projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/sources/decision-problems/sl-workflow/notes/final/sl-defensible-claims.md, section 3 (inputs D1 to D10; AI-derived) and S15 (austerity, from Herrmann's thesis).
Notes
The representation-theorem plan's response task cites the same inputs.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 3; size M.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "7/10",
"range": [
"1/5",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.