item-105
leaf/step · drafted
Statement
W1 holds as a statement of record with exact hypotheses and a witness, and the implication from M2(c) and M3 to the strong compatibility form is proved under added hypotheses or refuted by a countermodel.
Source
PRIORITIES.md, item 105 (belief–decision compatibility: W1 as a theorem of record, and the unresolved implication); projects/decision-theory/rounds/2026-09-29-li-bria-synthesis-spec/REPORT.md, section 7.
Notes
The line's first registered theorem would be W1; the belief-disagreement environment A1 is the obvious countermodel attempt for the strong form.
This node is item 105.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size L.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of item-106
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "1/2",
"range": [
"0/1",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.