item-109
leaf/question · drafted
Statement
The thin preservation theorem holds in asymptotic form for a logical-inductor principal whose self-trust is asymptotic and whose program is not a posterior: with the inductor's conditional self-trust as the hypothesis on her model and transparency as the actual record generated as the model says, the actual process satisfies the same self-trust in the limit.
Source
PRIORITIES.md, item 109 ("Preservation for a logical-inductor principal"): the finite theorem is exact and the inductor's self-trust is asymptotic; wanted, the asymptotic form and which hypotheses survive.
Notes
The public line's own bridge to the maintainer's register, in the filing session's reading; conditioned on the LI-corrigibility round's compilation technique, which is what the item would use.
This node is item 109.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size L.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- given of li-corrigibility-inequality-public
- part of public-legitimacy-improvable
- held by authorship-and-transparency
- given li-corrigibility-inequality-public
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"given li-corrigibility-inequality-public",
"held by authorship-and-transparency"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "13/20",
"range": [
"3/20",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.