item-25
leaf/task · drafted
Statement
A solution to item 25 ships the verdict, plus an explicit statement of whether the competence candidate survives it, plus — if the bound exists — whether the bounding hypothesis is itself credence-free or is a joint competence–credence hypothesis under skeleton v2 §2a.
Source
PRIORITIES.md, item 25 (Bound the near-indifference leakage, or show it cannot be bounded); its context: prompts/2026-08-11-phase-ii-competence/REPORT.md §1.6, §4.3 and §10; prompts/2026-08-11-corrigibility-phase-ii/REPORT.md §9.
Notes
Transcribed by the map-as-canonical round (prompts/2026-10-22-map-as-canonical); the entry's text is the Item section below, rendered back into PRIORITIES.md by checkers/priorities_render.py. The Statement is drawn from the entry's own deliverable line.
This node is item 25.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- held by deference-and-trust
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"held by deference-and-trust",
"no belief"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": null,
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.