item-65
leaf/task · drafted
Statement
Item 65, Whether `L_min(V)` is needed in its strong form, is delivered in the shape its entry states: either such a case, with what it forces `L_min(V)` to contain, or an argument that the weak relationship is closed under the architecture's operations.
Source
PRIORITIES.md, item 65 (Whether L_min(V) is needed in its strong form); its context: projects/normativity/legitimacy/rounds/2026-08-25-end-to-end-vertical-slice/FINDINGS.md §3.
Notes
Transcribed by the map-as-canonical round (prompts/2026-10-22-map-as-canonical); the entry's text is the Item section below, rendered back into PRIORITIES.md by checkers/priorities_render.py. The Statement is drawn from the entry's own deliverable line.
This node is item 65.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- held by legitimacy
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"held by legitimacy",
"no belief"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": null,
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.