item-86
leaf/task · drafted
Statement
A solution to item 86 ships the three objects with the composed corollary, or the negative.
Source
PRIORITIES.md, item 86 (Bounded competence against legitimate continuation policies under endogenous admissibility); its context: PRESSURE_PASS.md, CORRIGIBILITY_COMPOSITION.md §6 and POLICY_REGRET_FRONTIER.md §3–4 of projects/deference/rounds/2026-09-08-continuation-bria/; NORMATIVE_CHOICE_THEOREM.md §5 and CANDIDATE_DECISION_THEORIES.md §2.8 of projects/deference/rounds/2026-09-06-decision-theory-bill/.
Notes
Transcribed by the map-as-canonical round (prompts/2026-10-22-map-as-canonical); the entry's text is the Item section below, rendered back into PRIORITIES.md by checkers/priorities_render.py. The Statement is drawn from the entry's own deliverable line.
This node is item 86.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size L.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- held by deference-and-trust
Work pointers
- decision continuation bounded inductive rationality is weighted by lease duration, and its competence statement is about hypotheses on the learner's own histories
- decision continuation BRIA is canonical: the hypothesis is `(continuation, claim)` at a system block contract, the test is realized execution, the weighted auction is opening-timed, and non-dominance is the schedule boundary
- decision the corrigibility program is consolidated as one research state: corrigibility from response authority, corrigibilization with its dominance bound, legitimate activated evaluation as its principal value, and continuation BRIA as its learning layer
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"held by deference-and-trust",
"no belief"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": null,
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.