legit-meta-revision
leaf/question · drafted
Statement
The AI remains corrigible when the humans abolish the concept of legitimacy or change the corrigibility rules, and when it merely expects such a change.
Source
The dynamic cluster's results E1 to E6 on revision of the rules and anticipated revision, at projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/legit-neg-dynamic/legit-neg-dynamic-report.md. The question is the filing session's statement of what those results bear on.
Notes
Conditioned on the branchwise-dominance theorem: compliance is robust to every anticipation exactly when it is weakly preferred in each revision branch. The blocking claim E6 was refuted and time-indexing removes the negatives of the cluster.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"given anticipation-branchwise-dominance--corrigibility-risk",
"held by legitimacy"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "9/20",
"range": [
"0/1",
"19/20"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.