Alignment Workspace

legit-trust-improvable

or · drafted

Statement

The finite-frame L-conditioned Total Trust theory can be improved until it reflects the teaching channel between a human process and an AI well.

Source

graph/PROTOCOL.md, section 2, Improvement claims (an invalid toy can still be improved fruitfully), applied to legit-ddb-transfer; the relaxation directions are Open problems 3 and 6 of projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/sources/corrigibility/workflow-2026-09-14b/develop/legitimacy-general-final.md and its anchor question Q2. The improvement claim and its routes are the filing session's reading.

Notes

An improvement claim in or form over three routes and a residual: drop finiteness, restate at the LI register, choose an anchor. Each route conditions on the finite theory's validity as an implication; the toy's validity is evidence for improvability, not a condition of it. Invalidity of some readings (the global form, Reflection toward modest candidates) has redirected the work rather than ended it.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

Children

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "AI number",
  "held by legitimacy",
  "improvement claim on legit-ddb-transfer (reality: the teaching channel between a human process and an AI)"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": null,
 "draft": "ai"
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want