Alignment Workspace

legitimate-deliberation-definition

leaf/question · drafted

Statement

A process-based definition says what makes deliberation legitimate rather than illegitimate, without circularity.

Source

The maintainer's post Legitimate Deliberation (LessWrong, cited by URL in projects/deference/note-dump-2026-08-11/related-chats/2026-07-05__theory-of-legitimacy__f57f5f2d.md, turn 4; no local copy); the two process-based candidates in this frame, the public thick theory and the endpoint-preservation model.

Notes

Conditioned on the import task: the posts' own statements are needed before the reconciliation can quote them. The reliabilist use ("a mode of reasoning is legitimate if it has a reliable tendency toward the truth") is verified in the Meaning & Agency copy.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "AI number",
  "given task-import-lw-legitimacy-posts"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": {
  "J": 0,
  "mid": "3/5",
  "range": [
   "1/10",
   "1/1"
  ],
  "width": "1/1"
 },
 "draft": "ai",
 "root": {
  "status": "open",
  "Pr": {
   "hi": "1/1",
   "lo": "3/50",
   "mid": "127/200"
  },
  "value": null,
  "cost": "inf",
  "margin": "no established leaves"
 }
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want