li-models-human-progress
leaf/question · drafted
Statement
Logical induction models the progress of human philosophy and ethics, and the questions of reflective consistency (tiling), better than unbounded rationality does.
Source
projects/deference/note-dump-2026-08-11/notes/li-deference.md: "On the human side, it provides a good model of philosophical progress: prices (and, at a finer grain, trades) simultaneously play the role of prediction and evidence."
Notes
Evidence for picture (a) of the representability crux. The only written argument is the short passage of li-deference.md §0.2; the action writes the argument out with a worked example.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity-opus55; version 1; size M.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of deference-and-trust
- root (shared-claim) of deference-and-trust
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "13/20",
"range": [
"3/20",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai",
"root": {
"status": "open",
"Pr": {
"hi": "1/1",
"lo": "3/20",
"mid": "13/20"
},
"value": null,
"cost": "inf",
"margin": "no established leaves"
}
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.