local-criterion-three-cells.bridge
leaf/bridge · drafted
Statement
The refutation is of Deference Done Better's footnote 64/65 conjecture as written, in each of the three readings of strategy the package considered, and the two-cell results are the position statement's binary shutdown case only under one reading of strategy, which the position statement does not fix.
Source
projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/corr-legit-general, findings F1 and F18 (the reading of strategy is marked attribution-unvetted and the three-cell refutation does not depend on it).
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 2; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"attribution unvetted",
"given binary-shutdown-reading-tie-consistent"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "4/5",
"range": [
"3/10",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.