normativity-paper-candidates
leaf/step · drafted
Statement
Four extraction candidates exist for papers from the normativity line: normative serviceability and Sharp Timely Service, a liability theory for normative authority, traderization and finite-time strengthening of logical induction, and diachronic answerability under self-revision, each with its literature review completed.
Source
projects/normativity/legitimacy/checkpoint-2026-09-01/PAPER_CANDIDATES.md, sections 1 to 4 and the standing hazard (every candidate's literature review to be completed before any claim of novelty outside the repository).
Notes
Conditioned on the naming audit: stable names are what a paper needs.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of normativity
- given of task-naming-audit
- root (shared-claim) of normativity
- given task-naming-audit
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"given task-naming-audit"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "3/10",
"range": [
"0/1",
"4/5"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai",
"root": {
"status": "open",
"Pr": {
"hi": "17/20",
"lo": "0/1",
"mid": "133/400"
},
"value": null,
"cost": "85/1",
"margin": "no established leaves"
}
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.