policy-grouping-argument
leaf/task · drafted
Statement
A written argument exists that grouping decision points into policies, rather than evaluating one decision at a time (the reading under which EDT is optimal per decision), is justified, built from the Smoking Lesion workflow's inputs D1 to D10.
Source
projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/sources/decision-problems/sl-workflow/notes/final/sl-defensible-claims.md, section 3 (the Smoking Lesion ledger's inputs D1 to D10).
Notes
The given parent of the minimality-premise question.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 3; size M.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "31/40",
"range": [
"11/40",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.