posl-ilpacs-nontrivial-model

leaf/question · drafted

Statement

Some asymmetric preference relation with a strict preference satisfies both of Thornley 2025's principles POSL and ILPACS.

Source

projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/lit-shutdown-prefs, the open statement PostConsistency.posl_ilpacs_nontrivial_model_open; finding F7 there (the antecedent of the 2025 chain is empty for every agent ranking single-length lotteries by expected sum-total; the 2024 Timestep Dominance relation satisfies POSL and Neutrality and violates ILPACS).

Notes

A Lean OPEN as an actioned question; the given parent of the Thornley argument leaf.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size L.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

part of anti-naturality-review
root (shared-claim) of anti-naturality-review

Work pointers

open declaration PostConsistency.posl_ilpacs_nontrivial_model_open

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)

{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "AI number"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": {
  "J": 0,
  "mid": "17/40",
  "range": [
   "0/1",
   "37/40"
  ],
  "width": "1/1"
 },
 "draft": "ai",
 "root": {
  "status": "open",
  "Pr": {
   "hi": "37/40",
   "lo": "0/1",
   "mid": "17/40"
  },
  "value": null,
  "cost": "inf",
  "margin": "no established leaves"
 }
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want