quantitative-rates
leaf/question · drafted
Statement
With explicit schedules, the forcing results of the deference note give a finite-horizon bound on the value at stake.
Source
projects/deference/note-dump-2026-08-11/notes/deference-in-logical-induction-v6.md, section 8: "Quantitative rates. With explicit schedules, a finite-horizon 'how much value is at stake' bound, closer to the tiling use."; the landed step's note that the logical induction paper gives no rate statements for the carries.
Notes
Conditioned on the finite-time statement task: a precise statement of which hypothesis replaces the asymptotic relations makes the rates question well posed.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size L.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of formalism-open-questions-0-3
- given of task-finite-time-statement
- root (shared-claim) of formalism-open-questions-0-3
- given task-finite-time-statement
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"given task-finite-time-statement"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "3/10",
"range": [
"0/1",
"4/5"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai",
"root": {
"status": "open",
"Pr": {
"hi": "9/10",
"lo": "0/1",
"mid": "293/800"
},
"value": null,
"cost": "inf",
"margin": "no established leaves"
}
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.