retroactive-vs-prospective-judging
leaf/question · drafted
Statement
A future evaluator judges an earlier act by the standard in force when it was taken rather than by her revised standard.
Source
Stated from its content, as the sibling of the readout question readout-R1-vs-R2: a future evaluator whose standard has changed can judge an earlier act by her revised standard (retroactive) or by the standard in force when it was taken (prospective).
Notes
Stated as the prospective reading. Negatives that turn on the evaluator's standard being revised after the act need retroactive judging, and time-indexing the standard removes them.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- held by legitimacy
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"held by legitimacy"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "1/2",
"range": [
"0/1",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.