split-bill-is-robust-openness.complete
leaf/completeness · drafted
Statement
The one conjunct is the registered compression theorem: over a finite scenario with actual coverage inside the protected routes, the split bill is equivalent to coverage and standing under every declared intervention. That establishes the claim for the counterfactual half of Robust Openness over the abstracted scenario; it does not establish the actual-branch conjunct, any statement about how counterfactuals are produced, or that the componentwise persistence bill is the right external certificate, which the companion results carry.
Source
projects/normativity/CLAIMS.md, entry openness.certplus-is-robust-openness (class lean-proved, status active, origin round 2026-09-06-mathematical-consolidation; answers item 78). projects/normativity/legitimacy/rounds/2026-09-06-mathematical-consolidation/THEOREMS.md; the header of lean/Workspace/Normativity/Contrib/NonCaptureCertificate.lean; read by the site-vertical-slice round (projects/enabling/rounds/2026-10-24-site-vertical-slice).
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size S.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of split-bill-is-robust-openness
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": null,
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.