Alignment Workspace

vingean-tiling-content

leaf/question · drafted

Statement

Theorem 3 of Understanding Trust, UDT 1.1 Vingean tiling, has content under a non-naive reading of Faith in Joint Argmax, such as the computation-output model.

Source

projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/udt-paper-tiling/udt-paper-tiling-report.md, finding F-2: Theorem 3 has no content under the naive finite-probability reading, blocking for a naive formalization and not for the paper, which flags the issue itself at projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/sources/references/bli/understanding-trust/overleaf-final-source/main.tex (section Tiling & Trust, the Vingean theorem).

Notes

Links to the direct route's tiling step: the computational-observation model is the paper's intended reading of its Vingean theorem (the filing session's reading).

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "AI number"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": {
  "J": 0,
  "mid": "3/5",
  "range": [
   "1/10",
   "1/1"
  ],
  "width": "1/1"
 },
 "draft": "ai",
 "root": {
  "status": "open",
  "Pr": {
   "hi": "1/1",
   "lo": "1/10",
   "mid": "3/5"
  },
  "value": null,
  "cost": "inf",
  "margin": "no established leaves"
 }
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want