calibration-as-fairness
leaf/question · drafted
Statement
Calibration of the subjective states a decision procedure holds at its decision points is a fairness condition on decision problems, and the formal core's results are defences of that condition.
Source
projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/sources/decision-problems/sl-workflow/notes/final/sl-defensible-claims.md (the sl-workflow's ledger, S1 to S25), whose reading of the thesis is: right as naming, wrong as decision-determination, incomplete as location.
Notes
The thesis as the public sl-workflow ledger reads it. Its given edge says which definitions the defence has to carry.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number",
"given grouping-austerity-divergence-located"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "3/5",
"range": [
"1/10",
"1/1"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.