coalition-tiling-target
leaf/step · drafted
Statement
An LIDT/BRIA agent that joined a coalition at weights w while a human FairBot threat was live keeps executing the w-policy after the threat lapses.
Source
The filing session's target theorem, a tiling statement for an agent in the coalition, expected to turn on backward self-trust and on whether the later agent regards the earlier bargain as legitimate rather than coerced. FairBot is the program-equilibrium agent of Barasz et al. 2014, Robust Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma; LIDT/BRIA as in projects/decision-theory/rounds/2026-09-29-li-bria-synthesis-spec/PROBLEM_STATEMENT.md. An AI assessment, not checked: the statement is a target only with a non-threat source of the weights, empty for UDT 1.1, and open for LIDT/BRIA.
Notes
The coalitions line belongs to the abstraction arc; this leaf is filed here as a coordination route and is the same claim wherever that branch files it.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of coordination-with-others
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [
"AI number"
],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": {
"J": 0,
"mid": "9/40",
"range": [
"0/1",
"29/40"
],
"width": "1/1"
},
"draft": "ai"
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.