gap1-condensation-to-dd

leaf/question · drafted

Statement

If a policy is a perfect condensation of behaviour and the environment predicts the agent optimally, the predictor factors through the policy, so decision-determination holds, under a minimality premise that makes the agency correspondence true.

Source

projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/sources/udt-representation-theorem/project-status.md, the Gap 1 section (the statement as posed); projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/udt-condense-dd/udt-condense-dd-report.md: agency_correspondence_fails without minimality, with the perfectly-condenses conditional as the form to prove.

Notes

As posed, ill-posed: three access-type readings, one definitional, one failing off-support, one a definition-unfolding. The live version is the conditional with a minimality premise, which is the action; the approximate reading is the sibling formal result.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)

{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "AI number",
  "given policy-grouping-argument"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": {
  "J": 0,
  "mid": "2/5",
  "range": [
   "0/1",
   "9/10"
  ],
  "width": "1/1"
 },
 "draft": "ai"
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want