item-68

leaf/task · drafted

Statement

Item 68, Discharging provenance adequacy, is delivered in the shape its entry states: either an adequacy property that is non-circular, compatible with permitted persuasion, and falsified by the hidden-dependency fixtures, or an argument that none exists without a world counterfactual, with the counterexample.

Source

PRIORITIES.md, item 68 (Discharging provenance adequacy); its context: projects/normativity/legitimacy/rounds/2026-08-25-legitimate-evolution/COUNTERMODELS.md §8; .../2026-08-25-carroll-legitimacy-test/CRITERION.md §6.

Notes

Transcribed by the map-as-canonical round (prompts/2026-10-22-map-as-canonical); the entry's text is the Item section below, rendered back into PRIORITIES.md by checkers/priorities_render.py. The Statement is drawn from the entry's own deliverable line.

This node is item 68.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size M.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

held by legitimacy

Work pointers

decision transparency is the reference-relative form of reason mediation, stated on the frame, and its defect is the pathwise disagreement mass

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)

{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "held by legitimacy",
  "no belief"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": null,
 "draft": "ai"
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want