Alignment Workspace

public-legitimacy-theory

and · drafted

Statement

The public repository defines legitimacy at two levels, a thin specification (correct, sufficient, value) on a finite setting with her prior, model, actual process and a baseline, and a thick definition (Integrity, authorship, Robust Openness, transparency), and proves that the thick conditions satisfy the thin specification.

Source

wiki/Legitimacy.md, sections "Legitimacy has two levels" ("The thin level is a specification: what a legitimacy concept must do." "The thick level is the definition below — Integrity, authorship, Robust Openness, transparency — and the claim about it is twofold: it captures the intuitive concept, and it satisfies the thin specification.") and "Legitimacy has two halves"; the legitimacy spine of projects/normativity/CLAIMS.md and the thin.* entries of projects/deference/CLAIMS.md.

Notes

The public line's legitimacy theory, filed as a plan of this frame with public sources; no want is attributed. Read literally the claim is about what the repository defines and proves, which is why its conjuncts are high; whether the theory is the right account is the bridge crux. Success is valued as the frame's top class, the convention for plan roots.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size L.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

Children

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "AI number"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": null,
 "draft": "ai",
 "root": {
  "status": "open",
  "Pr": {
   "hi": "1/8",
   "lo": "819/80000",
   "mid": "32661/320000"
  },
  "value": {
   "hi": "1/1",
   "lo": "-1/1",
   "mid": "32661/320000"
  },
  "cost": "198/1",
  "margin": "no established leaves"
 }
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want