want-truth-through-literature-dialogue

leaf/want · drafted

Statement

The corrigibility picture is developed in dialogue with the literature's positions toward the truest picture rather than a defended one.

Source

The author, projects/deference/corrigibility-note-dump-2026-10-01/position-statement-v3.md, section 4 ("Two things, in the author's words"): "developing the picture so far and figuring out where the conversation should go next in service of dialoguing with the simulated voices of the literature, in pursuit of the truth."

Notes

Placed in the review frame because the quoted words name the dialogue with the literature's voices, which is this frame's method. Filed from the owner's public words.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size S.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)

{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "given anti-naturality-walk",
  "given: conditionals not judged",
  "no belief",
  "owner has not confirmed"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": null,
 "draft": "ai",
 "root": {
  "status": "open",
  "Pr": {
   "hi": "1/2",
   "lo": "1/2",
   "mid": "1/2"
  },
  "value": null,
  "cost": "inf",
  "margin": "no established leaves"
 }
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want