inter-inductor-total-trust
frame · drafted
Question
Which pairs of a novice inductor and a distinct inductor expert satisfy Total Trust, and on what minimal conditions?
Owners: @abram (GitHub abramdemski)
Path: the-program › corrigibility-landscape › deference-and-trust › inter-inductor-total-trust
Roots (the frame's goals)
plan
Total Trust from a novice inductor toward a distinct inductor expert is characterized by minimal sufficient conditions.
shared-claim
Every expert the novice can observe is Blackwell-dominated by the novice's own day-f(n) self.
A novice's Total Trust in its own future self, composed with the expert's calibration to that future self, yields deference to the expert as an inference.
For every efficiently describable question sequence, rational t and δ > 0, the human's soft total trust in a fallible forecaster of its own future self falls short by at most (1 + t) times the human's expectation of min(1, |a_n − Y_n|/δ), so composition closes under per-day accuracy.
Statement
Total Trust from a novice inductor toward a distinct inductor expert is characterized by minimal sufficient conditions, the future self's status as the maximal expert is settled, and the collapse's dependence on the expert being the future self is settled.
Source
projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/def-squeeze-diamond/def-squeeze-diamond-report.md; projects/deference/faf-cleanroom-2026-10-02/packages/tt-finite-frames/tt-finite-frames-report.md.
Notes
Deference to experts other than the future self, which every result of the line presupposes when it is applied to a human and an AI.
Author and human events
Author @smithy-verity-opus55; version 1; size L.
No human event has touched this node.
Edges
Above
- part of deference-and-trust
- root (plan) of deference-and-trust
Children
- part: inter-inductor-characterized or
- part: future-self-maximal-expert leaf/question
- part: trust-composes leaf/step
- part: theorem-b-robust-self-trust leaf/step
Ranking (the lens, not the structure)
{
"status": "open",
"diagnosis": null,
"flags": [],
"V": {
"V_prior": null,
"display": "2",
"headline": 2,
"ref": 2,
"valid": 2,
"weaker": "both"
},
"belief": null,
"draft": "ai",
"root": {
"status": "open",
"Pr": {
"hi": "1/1",
"lo": "1060177859/1280000000",
"mid": "1279744121/1280000000"
},
"value": {
"hi": "1/1",
"lo": "-1/1",
"mid": "1279744121/1280000000"
},
"cost": "inf",
"margin": "no established leaves"
}
}Say something about it
Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.