item-90

leaf/task · drafted

Statement

A solution to item 90 ships the certificate, or the exact combinator the pinned suite lacks.

Source

PRIORITIES.md, item 90 (The generability certificate of the soft-weighted finite-menu constraint); its context: LUV_COMPILATION.md §2 and §4, LI_CORRIGIBILITY.md §3 of the round; the pinned formalization's Construction/Witnesses/LUVSyntax.lean for the certificate shape and its own triangularSoftmaxPoly for a fold of the same kind.

Notes

Transcribed by the map-as-canonical round (prompts/2026-10-22-map-as-canonical); the entry's text is the Item section below, rendered back into PRIORITIES.md by checkers/priorities_render.py. The Statement is drawn from the entry's own deliverable line.

This node is item 90.

Author and human events

Author @smithy-verity; version 1; size L.

No human event has touched this node.

Edges

Above

held by deference-and-trust

Work pointers

decision the corrigibility nucleus is landed; item 90 is split

Ranking (the lens, not the structure)

{
 "status": "open",
 "diagnosis": null,
 "flags": [
  "held by deference-and-trust",
  "no belief"
 ],
 "V": {
  "V_prior": null,
  "display": "2",
  "headline": 2,
  "ref": 2,
  "valid": 2,
  "weaker": "both"
 },
 "belief": null,
 "draft": "ai"
}

Say something about it

Each verb opens a prefilled issue; a round files what lands as the ledger event it is.

comment · challenge · estimate · want